Monday, June 22, 2009

To Arms Gentle Knights Errant, Our Maidens Virtue Needs Defending

By Individualist
“The Purpose of government is to limit the needs of its citizens from the involvement of the government.”

To Arms, To Arms my Valiant Warrior Princes
We are Charged to Protect our Maiden’s Virtue
Her voice so like the warble of Gentle Finches
Ere All Silenced by Enemy slashing Slanders, too




So I Implore you Gentle Conservative Vassals
Who wish to Arm Against the Trolls’ Breath
Carry on to Glean Shields against the Missiles
For Honor’s Loss is a Fate worse than Death


Reference: Trollywood



In the first part of this post I evaluated several examples of the liberal’s attempts to silence conservative women by quite frankly sexually harassing them. I pointed out the tactics they use. They call them sluts and attack their demeanor. They have liberals openly ridicule them; they have men lambast them by talking of sexually abusing them. They make jokes about rape and openly disparage them. Then when this is done the “feminists” will reluctantly comment on the abhorrent nature of the statements but will then proceed to lecture that conservatives should quit doing it either without giving examples or dragging out factual errors made by them 17 years ago. They do this to ridicule and condemn and to make conservative women want to stop taking a public stance in the arena of politics. Or as Andrew Klavan at Big Hollywood suggests is the standard answer of the left to Conservative thought, Shut The F*** Up.

So what are we conservatives to do? As conservatives we must step up and have at the monstrous Trolls that are behind this. We must act as the knights errant of Cervantes’ tales and defend conservative women from these attacks. We must not shy from this course. For this tactic is as old as the notion of chivalry itself, even older. If you attack a woman’s virtue you also attack the honor of the men who are their husbands, fathers, brothers and family friends. It is a Pas d’Armes and if the challenge is not answered then they have the better of you. One way to show a man a coward and thus your dominance of him is too openly disparage his woman. I know the feminists don’t want to hear it but it is ingrained in out nature. The insult is effective as it is tied to our survival (procreation).

We conservatives tend to believe in Individualism and so we do for ourselves. When we get together we focus on what the government is doing to us and how to either stop the government or get around the stricture. We don’t tend to form groups to keep people from talking, acting or thinking in certain proscribed ways. It is the opposite of our nature. We will answer challenges and speak out against policies we disapprove but for the most part when it comes to the verbal art of ridicule we are usually on the defensive.

We need to learn to take notice and stand up to these attacks. We have failed to fend off the Trolls usually under the assumption that these base statements are beneath our contempt. So now we are overrun. We need to see the signs.



Warning Trolls

But you may say to me Indy there you go again. Chivalry is dead, this is the 21st Century. These ideas are gone. Who still preaches those values. Interesting enough there is Stacy McDonald author of the book Raising Maidens who talks of teaching virtue to young ladies and the bond between Mother and Daughter.



She is a 21st century source for the virtue of maidenhood and also has some insight on her blog as to the true Knights in Shining Armor that are there to protect the young maiden’s virtue, Fathers.

In reading through here blog I can see that she would be the first to condemn any man who jokes of “rape” or “Hate F***” or whatever euphemism the leftists wish to use. There are no moral equivalencies for our mothers when it comes to this. When someone starts talking of what Rush Limbaugh may or may not have done 17 years ago I think a Mom would have this answer:

“Two wrongs don’t make a right”

I find it Ironic that in the very flower of Victorian womanhood one would have a more enlightened answer to jokes inferring the rape of daughters than the modern feminist movement.

So we must be our own men and we must protect our woman. This is the standard upon which we must charge forward. We conservative must act as the questing Knights Errant of Arthurian Legend or for the women as Le Pucelle (the Maid), Joan of Arc. At Big Hollywood several have been having forth at David Lettermen for his comments about Sara Palin’s children. But what are the weapons of a 21st century cyber knight. The Blog, Music, TV, Literature, the Theater all the trappings of our culture are the playing field. The weapons are satire, thoughtful reasoning and impassioned belief. The armor is knowledge of the facts and ability to see through sophistry and hyperbole. Are there tools of combat that we have left out? The Protest March for one. Not normally our thing, we have come out in a big way on Tax Day at the Tea Parties and it must have had an effect since the leftists at MSNBC had to devote so much time denigrating it with sexual references.

But there are other weapons, nastier ones. The Nuisance Suit is one. Sara Palin has had to spend one half million dollars just to fend off bogus lawsuits. Tom Delay was continually indicted by an unscrupulous partisan state’s attorney who for two years kept throwing out charges that would get dropped. The same guy did this to Kay Bailey Hutchinson as well. Do we have clandestine squads of bloggers to gather on the internet just to dream up ways to harass democrats. This is where I’d like to draw the line but there is also a part of me that would like payback I must admit. Part of me would like to see a concerted conservative effort cause a David Letterman to be fired through the filing of nuisance suits against CBS using the same tactics that were successfully used on fellow conservative. I’d like to see this even though I know such impulse is wrong.

Would we not like to have payback for Clarence Thomas, Judge Bork, Newt Gingritch, Carrie Prajean and all others that have been so unfairly maligned for just expressing their political viewpoints. Even if the sentiment just is to sate our thirst for vengeance. Especially if such tactics employed against Frank, Pelosi , Dodd Schumer and the rest might mean a leftist not being reelected. You see my point. Political survival can be at stake. The Knights of medieval times had considered similar issues in warfare back then. Certain weapons were considered dishonorable. One could use them to win the day but one could not regain one’s honor or the honor of those they are charged to protect if they are used. The longbow was considered as such.

But as to those who cannot be civil to a woman because she disagrees politically. Who call her slut, talk to her as if she was not human, talk suggestively of Rape. Perhaps giving this kind of grief would not be unjustified. After all is there not a difference between how a knight would fight on the field of honor against another noble knight and how a knight would deal with a horrid monstrosity such as a giant, dragon or troll. Are we not right in seeing those that act in the manner above in such a light. The question is not an easy one.

Whatever the weapons my friend the call to action must be clear. We must begin to fight back. We cannot allow this to go unanswered any more. As Edward Bulwer-Lytton states in his 1839 play Richilieu; Or the Conspiracy:

“True, This! —
Beneath the rule of men entirely great,
The pen is mightier than the sword. Behold
The arch-enchanters wand! — itself a nothing! —
But taking sorcery from the master-hand
To paralyse the Cæsars, and to strike
The loud earth breathless! — Take away the sword —
States can be saved without it!”


We must find some way to make certain that liberals who feel empowered to use lies and slander receive the biting thrust of our pens in answer. I will leave you with this quote from Cervantes’ The Man of La Mancha.

“Happy she that might body and soul adorn
With thy rich livery and thy high desire;
And see thy happy knight, by honour borne,
In cruel combat, broaching out his ire.”

Read more!

Sexual Obsession, Into the Dungeons of the Mindset of Trollywood

By Individualist
“The Purpose of government is to limit the needs of its citizens from the involvement of the government.”

Moving from Shadow to Night, Hiding from Truth’s Grasp
Sinking into the depths where cavernous plotting doth twist
Lies and Deception mask the Hatred and Venom of the Asp
Where Power and Fame are the Lost Soul’s only Grist




This will be the first of two posts this week related to each other in concept. This post will cover serious and adult topics of the liberals need to denigrate and humiliate conservative women through sexual depraved insults and slanders. This post will deal with the what and potentially the why. The next will deal with the possible response we should have to it. This may be lengthy as I feel I need to cover material to prove my point. Enjoy.



I have to travel a lot for my work and stay in Hotels. One particular Hotel offers movies labeled “Still in Theaters”, “Recent Attractions” and “Adult” for sale. Just click the orange button and you’ve spent $16. You can page through the movies four at a time by hitting nine. If you get through the Recent Attractions it will take you to the Adult films and the first one that is shown is below:



Just one click too many and there you have it the Best Seller 4 and a half star porn film “Who’s Nailin Palin”. What a sweet tribute to the Governor of Alaska, I wonder who is behind it. I found it so disturbing I decided to research what was behind this.

It was released by Larry Flint’s Hustler magazine in October of 2008 just in time for the election. There was a link to the script which starts out with two Russians whose Tank breaks down outside of Palin’s house and she evidently uses her “diplomatic” skills to improve relations with the Ruskies. I did not read further. At this point it is not the Porn that is getting to me it is the venomous cruelty behind it.

In my research I found that this industrious crew has not had enough of slandering the Governor, no they want to make more such movies. On June 12 Hustler’s Roger Klipon, Krypton, whatever made an offer to Carrie Prajean for $500K below:

“We were so sorry to hear about your recent departure from the Miss California Organization. However I think we have some news that can turn this situation around. Your reign as Miss California doesn’t have to end.

Hustler Video would like to offer you to play the role of California in our new interactive parody film, Your Nailin Palin. Your scene would feature some hot girl-on-girl action with adult performer Lisa Ann who’s portraying the former VP candidate. Don’t worry you’ll have some chance to have opposite sex as well. Can’t wait to hear what you think.”


Classy huh! Klipon is definitely a people person isn’t he.

Greg Gutfeld has touched on this theme at Big Hollywood.



Eminem Post

Another post by Mr. Gutfeld on Big Hollywood about the writings of Henry “the Tool” Rollins regarding Ann Coulter:

Henry Rollin's Post

Essentially Mr. Rollins expresses his superior debating skills in the old Lincoln Douglas debate format where his reasoning is as follows. You’re going to be my sex slave and I will force myself on you and then you will Shut the F*** up. Has a way with the ladies, doesn’t he.

So I am now asking myself the question what is it with the left and their obsession with conservative women. After all this is not just petty and trite, it is sickeningly mean. Larry Flint is supposedly sitting on a Gold mine so what is he so unhappy about? What the heck did Carrie Prejean do? What justifies trying to harm everyone that disagrees with you politically? How Pathetic!

Then of course there are wannabees. Here’s a juicy clip from the “Anger” guy or is it “Auger” guy. He is digging himself into a hole.



Auger Guy posted a video of two Asian women in a Lesbian scene. The video edited out by me showed another women in white panties being pulled down by the woman shown here in the picture. Auger Guy had this to say:

“And is it just me or does the girl at the front look like Michelle Malkin? Ohhhhhh, I just thought of a horribly devious thing to do. Maybe I should rename this post to “Michell Malkin lesbian sex tape released”. That oughta genrate some pervy search engine traffic.”

That’s right Auger don’t they all look alike. It’s not a bigoted cliché when “progressives” do it. When his video was flagged and removed this was his response:

“this is the work or some loser hater, not a genuinely offended person. It isn’t as if it matters anyway, this is hardly an important video to me. Either it was one of the normal boring haters who thought they were getting back at me by doing or it was a Malkin supporter. Either way, f*** you losers.”

Evidently he posts stills of naked women and suggestive titles over some liberal rant because people who like “porn” don’t know how to hit the “stop” button. But it doesn’t matter anyways (his words). What strikes me as funny is that he would post this of Michelle Malkin and then call someone who was offended by that “the Hater”. But this guy is just fooling around but he doesn’t even clue in to what a slanderous fool he is.

Then we come to David Bedwetterman. His non-apology was actually more offensive than his joke. I did not mention rape. No Dave, you just inferred it by making the impregnator in the joke a man who was publicly accused of rape. I meant the older daughter. Yes and all 17 year girls who make a mistake and get pregnant and make the courageous decision to keep their child instead of murdering it deserve to have jokes made about them about rapists impregnating them. Supposedly he gave a real apology yesterday but at this point it is just to save his career so I did not bother to find it and listen.

Just when I thought the gutter’s bottom was reached we slide right into the sewer drain. The most offensive I think came in the response from the National Organization for Women.

Now Response
“The sexualization of girls and women in the media is reaching new lows these days — it is exploitative and has a negative effect on how all women and girls are perceived and how they view themselves. Letterman also joked about what he called Palin’s “slutty flight attendant look” — yet another example of how the media love to focus on a woman politician’s appearance, especially as it relates to her sexual appeal to men. Someone of Letterman’s stature, who appears on what used to be known as “the Tiffany Network” (CBS), should be above wallowing in the juvenile, sexist mud that other comedians and broadcasters seem to prefer.

On that point, it’s important to note that when Chelsea Clinton was 13 years old she was the target of numerous insults based on her appearance. Rush Limbaugh even referred to her as the “White House dog.” NOW hopes that all the conservatives who are fired up about sexism in the media lately will join us in calling out sexism when it is directed at women who aren’t professed conservatives.”


So Letterman should be taken to task for the “slutty flight attendant” line but not for inferring “rape” of a child. Exactly what in the blue blazes does a comment that Rush Limbaugh made in 1992 have to do with it. Well NOW let’s examine that comment shall we.

Lying Liar

Let’s see, the reference you give about conservatives getting fired up evidently references the Franken lie and not the actual show that aired. Franken could not even get the year of the show correct, 1992 and not 1993. So Bedwetterman makes a “rape” joke about a child (actually two children because the listener can infer either one) we conservatives are supposed to wear hair shirts because AL Franken lied about what Rush Limbaugh said 17 years ago. I guess the line about women never forgetting slight applies here.

Ok NOW you are voted the Organization Most Likely to Support a Misogynist, the OSMOSIS award. That’s right Move Over Taliban the NOW Gals have edged you out. Watch for white powder in the reward envelope when it is sent back because I believe Bin Ladin had it last.

But we are not done with the conservobabes yet. No sir we have heard from Hustler now let’s hear from Playboy. There was an article on Playboy’s website that was eventually pulled because it was so offensive by Guy Cimbalo.

Right Wing News

It is discussed very eloquently by Right Wing News. Essentially it is a list of 10 top conservative women Mr. Cimbalo would like to Hate F***. “Rape” involves hating and intercourse does it not. Hmmm….

These aggrieved women are
• Michelle Malkin
• Megyn Kelly
• Mary Katharine Ham
• Amanda Carpenter
• Elisabeth Hasselbeck
• Dana Perino
• Laura Ingraham
• Pamela Geller
• Michele Bachmann
• Peggy Noonan

And again the so-called feminist response itself is in its own way more hurtful than the article.

Salon.com

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/erbe/2009/06/03/playboy-mix-of-sex-hate-and-politics-demeans-conservative-women.html

I could elaborate but I will chose instead to list the post by “Unbelievable” instead:

Unbelievable...
“So, advocating the rape of someone who holds political views that you disagree with is somehow less repulsive than advocating the rape of someone who holds the same political views you do? And in fact it is a sliding scale. Michele Malkin being further to one end than Amanda Carpenter.

Really? I think rape is equally repulsive no matter who the victim is. I think assigning worth to people based on their political views is also repulsive.
What? Did your editor tell you (that) you must write an article condemning Playboy and this is the best you can come up with? You're as disgusting as the author of the Playboy article.”


In conclusion what should we conservatives make of this. Right Wing News is spot on. This is not just meanness and off the cuff ad hominem attacks. This is an attempt to threaten conservative women and scare them off by indulging in the basest and sickest sexual references. The so-called feminists compound the issue with fake statements of condemnation that end up being off hand insults aimed at their conservative values. You can see with the repetition of the tactic that this a just a play from a strategy book.

But the motivations behind it are belied by their words. Liberal men fear conservative women because you actually have to listen to them and to convince them you have to show them. With a liberal woman you can pretend to listen to their rants about misogyny and equal rights and at the right time you parrot what they say back to them. Just like the snickers commercial where the guy asks the girl back to his room and then saves himself by “blogging” for the cause. Because all a liberal woman cares about is your submission to identity politics. With a conservative woman she does not involve herself in identity politics. She actually wants an honest answer. There are no cheat sheets on the correct answers in articles in women’s magazines. Hint for liberals: It’s called independent thought.

So it is easier to be crude and sexual harass them to make them feel small in an attempt to keep them from speaking out. The feminists play right into it. In the Salon.com articles Michelle Malkin has her husband to write her speeches for her. She is derided as the “little woman” dependent on some man. The insults have layers to them. The left cannot have famous conservative women because they would lose that leg of identity politics. How can you tell a 20 something male he has to vote liberal to get laid when there are gorgeous women like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham et al. The answer is you can’t. So they do everything to hurt these woman. Politics is more important than Truth to a Liberal.

So they act like Trolls. How a propros!
Read more!

Lies, Damn Lies & The Environmentalists

First off let me say that I have no interest in leaving behind to my daughters a world that is full of polluted air, poisonous water and devoid of trees. But the environmentalist movement (Eco-Nazis) have gone way too far in trying to control humanity by their constant use of scare tactics. Starting with the patron saint of Eco-Nazism – Rachel Carson – these people are responsible for more deaths than the total body count of World War Two (70 million). The Eco-Nazis are wreaking havoc across the globe and no one seems to be standing in their way.

In Africa alone it is estimated that at least 50 million people have died from malaria since 1972. Why since 1972? Well that was the year that the US and UN instituted a ban on DDT. DDT is a safe, cheap pesticide that eradicates the mosquitoes that carry and transmit malaria. Why was it banned? Because in her nauseatingly propagandistic book “Silent Spring”, Rachel Carson asserted that because DDT was working it’s way into the diets of birds, eventually the birds would produce eggs with shells too thin to survive the gestation process and therefore would go extinct and no more bird songs would be heard, therefore the “silent spring.” Everything about her claims has been since proven to be completely wrong. But the Eco-Nazis and the sheeple that support them got the DDT ban in place and now 30+ years later 50 million Africans have died plus another 20-25 million worldwide in areas prone to mosquito infestation, all because the surest, cheapest way to prevent them from contracting the disease that killed them, was denied them to save some birds who were never even in danger. Anybody out there see anything wrong with this?

How about the issue of air pollution? Remember how we were told that living in a large city like New York or LA was the equivalent of smoking two packs a day due to the poor quality of the air in places like that? Utter nonsense. If this were true, why was there never any type of spike in the incidence of emphysema or other dangerous pulmonary diseases in those cities? Same thing with “second hand smoke.” The human respiratory system is basically a filtering system that extracts oxygen from ambient air for the body to use, but also pulls out a lot of other potentially bad stuff, stuff that can be found in tobacco smoke. So if lots of these toxins are pulled out of tobacco smoke in their first filtering through the lungs, how is it possible that the filtered air expelled from the lungs be more polluted than the original smoke that was not filtered? It is stupefying how supposedly intelligent people fall for this garbage.

Because of the Eco-Nazis and their use of phony science to support their claims, the American auto industry is now a state run enterprise. The ridiculous and draconian CAFE emissions standards imposed on the industry by the Eco-Nazis and their sheeple in Congress, along with the presidents of both parties who signed the legislation, GM, Ford and Chrysler were forced to make cars that didn’t perform the way their customers wanted them too, and were made more expensive to boot. The Eco-Nazis want to eliminate the internal combustion engine and now they’ve got the means to do it. Think about this for a few minutes; the earth is 75% water, 25% land mass. So over 75% of the earth, no pollution is occurring. Of the 25% land mass only around 5% (or less) is actually occupied by man. That means that over approximately 95% of the earth’s surface, no eco-damaging activity is taking place. And I have no clue as to what percent of the remaining 5% actually has polluting activity taking place. So who in their logical mind can believe that all the internal combustion engines and all the factories, and all the campfires, and all the Bar-B-Q’s, and all the candles, and all the lawnmowers, and all the cow farts in all the world can actually have a permanent global global effect on the quality of the air on earth? Even volcanic explosions only have a temporary effect on air quality, over a limited area and only for a relatively short period of time.

The agenda of the Eco-Nazis is to control humanity. That may seem like a stretch, but it is true. And to do this they want to eliminate cheap energy. Cheap energy saves lives, it is indispensable to life in the 21st century. What would medical care look like if the energy to run hospitals or research facilities was four to five times more expensive. If the Eco-Nazis were actually serious about having safe, cheap, clean, inexhaustible energy sources there would be no opposition to nuclear energy. Solar, wind and other types of alternative energy sources are just not viable right now and won’t be for at least twenty years if then even. It is folly to spend money in these economic times to purse any of them. But that doesn’t square with the agenda of the Eco-Nazis. And now they’ve got a friend in the White House.

The Eco-Nazis and the sheeple that support them do not care about condemning to death innocent people if their needs conflict with lies of the Eco-Nazis. The Eco-Nazis come clothed in a cloak of benign desires to “save the planet.” And they are the only ones who can save it. But they don’t care about being wrong, they don’t care about tens of millions of malaria victims, they don’t care about wrecking economies, they don’t care about anything but making you live your life they way they want you to live it. And they try to do it by denying you access to the energy you need to live life as you see fit. If people let men like Al Gore and Robert Kennedy Jr. define the way we can live our lives as free Americans, well then, they will richly deserve the fate that befalls them.

Read more!

Liberal Myths vs. The Truth

In America, the post 1968 liberal movement has tried (and largely succeeded) to hijack the public discourse and re-write American history in the best Stalinist tradition. Here are three popular liberal myths with an acompanying short historical summary exploding each one.

Liberal Myth No.1
The United States was founded by liberals seeking a change from the status quo.

The Truth
The United States was founded (if you discount the failed Jamestown settlement) by the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The Puritans were the most conservative sect of the conservative Calvanist movement of Protestant Europe. These were the religious right of their day. They left their homes in Europe to be free of overbearing government intrusion in their lives. The foremost being religious persecution. They sought to build a place where they could worship their God as they saw fit. A place where the government would be relatively weak. Over time the Puritan model was used by those who wrote our founding documents as a template for the new republic. Those who preferred the European way of doing things (large powerful central governments, state run labor “guilds”, a governing “elite” class) were called “Loyalists” and we call their descendants “Canadians” today. Even then the New York colony was known to be the most liberal of the original 13. And they were the last colony to sign the Declaration of Independence. And it was touch and go as to whether or not they would. As Casey Stengel once said, “you can look it up.”

Liberal Myth No.2
It was liberals who formed the anti-slavery movement which led to the Civil War.

The Truth
The anti-slavery movement, the “abolitionists” was founded in the evangelical Protestant churches of what would become the Union states. It’s leaders from John Brown on down were conservative, evangelical Christian ministers and church leaders. These men and women, informed by their faith, were the first ones to sacrifice their lives to put an end to institutionalized slavery in the United States. And they stirred the entire nation. It was the southern states, dominated by Democrats, that tried to destroy the Union to hold onto their slaves. And once war broke out, in liberal New York, there were the “draft riots” to protest “Mr. Lincoln’s war to free the slaves.”

Liberal Myth No.3
Liberals were the prime movers in America’s effort to defeat Hitler.

The Truth
Before Dec. 7, 1941 opposition to entering “another European War” was widespread and pervaded both sides of the political aisle. FDR believed he had to keep his meetings with Churchill clandestine even after having swept into his 3rd term in 1940, because the entire country did not want send American boys to die in Europe. This opposition was led primarily by World War vets who knew what war in Europe was like and did not want to send there sons to die in another one. And as for those in America who held Nazi sympathies, can you guess which American this author was writing about?

“ Writing at the time, Joe applauded Hitler's insight in realizing the German people's "need of a common enemy, someone of whom to make the goat. Someone, by whose riddance the Germans would feel they had cast out the cause of their predicament. It was excellent psychology, and it was too bad that it had to be done to the Jews. The dislike of the Jews, however, was well-founded. They were at the heads of all big business, in law etc. It is all to their credit for them to get so far, but their methods had been quite unscrupulous ... the lawyers and prominent judges were Jews, and if you had a case against a Jew, you were nearly always sure to lose it. ... As far as the brutality is concerned, it must have been necessary to use some.” The paragraph is from a biography of Joseph P. Kennedy Sr. by Edward Renahan Jr. At the time Kennedy was FDR’s ambassador to Great Britain.

FDR himself, in his mis-guided ego regarding his own powers of persuasion, felt that he could negotiate with Hitler if the need to do so ever surfaced. He believed that Hitler would not lie to him as he had to Chamberlain (another liberal). Sound like anyone we just inaugurated? As the war in Europe approached final allied victory, FDR also believed, and told Churchill, that he and he alone knew how to handle “Uncle Joe” (FDR’s condescending name for Stalin). So he believed Stalin’s promise that at the war’s conclusion, Soviet troops would withdraw from the countries they had driven the Nazis out of, and that free elections would be held in these nations. FDR thereby consigned millions of people to Communist, totalitarian, dictatorships for the next 40 years, and gave birth to the Cold War.

Had it not been for Pearl Harbor, FDR was quite prepared to see Europe fall, relying on the Atlantic Ocean to give America enough time to build up the forces necessary to defend the homeland and make Hitler think twice about a trans-oceanic invasion.

A small historical footnote. It is an old tradition (probably going back to the Continental Army) that the officer corps of our military keep their political affiliations and leanings private until their terms of service were finished. In modern American history, only 5 men have had 5 stars on their shoulders, and they were all WWII commanders: Generals George Marshall, FDR’s Chief of Staff, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Supreme Commander Allied Expeditionary Forces, Omar Bradley, Commander US Ground Forces European Theater of Operations, Douglas MacArthur, Commander US Ground Forces Pacific, and Admiral Chester Nimitz, Commander Central Command Pacific. These 5 men developed the strategies, employed the tactics, and led the troops that secured our victories that won WWII. Conservatives or Republicans, all.

Read more!

DATELINE: Omaha Beach

It' serenely quiet as I walk the beach at "Bloody Omaha" of Normandy. No seagulls, no voices, just the soft lapping off the English Channel against the beach. It's a rather unremarkable beach as beaches go, and I seen a whole lot of them. Rather it's the remarkable events that started here before dawn 65 years ago that make this place special. Remarkable young men did the unnatural, they poured out of landing craft and plunged into battle, many for the first time and many for their only time. When you see the terrain you can see why it turned into a killing field. At high tide you still have quite a distance to cover to get to the rise of the land from the beach. The berns and hills above Omaha are tall and imposing. Looking at those steep approaches from their landing craft must have caused a fear I can't identify with. The courage to suck it up and burst out of the Higgins boats and dash for the shore took strength and conviction. Many never made it past the lowering of the ramps, yards from shore would be as close as they get before their lives would end. As I leave Omaha I stop to pick up a couple of peices of trash and walk up the short hill the ends at a draw that gives you driving access to Omaha Beach. German tourist look at me in a curious way as I drop the trash in a receptacle near the parking lot. It clear to me that the don't feel that "Bloody Omaha" is sacred ground, every bit as sacred as Gettysburg or Iwo Jima. I say nothing as the tourists fall silent and munch on apples and boot a soccer ball around as I walk past. Perhaps the look on my face said all that needed to be said. Read more!

The Coming Fall of Firefly

President Firefly is making "liberal" a bad word again. He now wants military personell to give Miranda warnings to terroists and enemy combatants captured on the battle field. Are court appointed sharia lawyers far Behind?


This latest ridiculousness is only one of the many continuing Firefly embarrassments that display his desire to toss some spoils to the radical hate-American left in the Democratic Party. (Pelosi, Leahy, Frank, etc.) This behavior includes the constant ass-kissing to the perceptions of radical Islamo-fascists and bigoted "moderate Muslims." Firefly tries to persuade the world that the Palestinians are a put upon and persecuted minority when in fact the only minority in the Middle East are the Jews and a racist oppressive majority - Muslim Arabs - who want to destroy the Jewish state.

Several pundits have pointed out that Firefly has painted himself into a corner as far as foreign policy is concerned because Republicans are now unified in opposition and if he does not bow to the extremist left on the war, there is an electoral majority against him. And this is only the beginning.

Not many people thought, after his assumption of office that he would govern so far from the left. Not with the centrist national security apparatus he assembled. But stupidly, he has done just exactly that. To make matters worse, he rammed through extermely destructive leftist legislation paying for it by compiling more debt in 4 months than George Bush did in 8 years. And more quickly than he expected his poisonous trees are starting to bear fruit.

Nothing could have possibly united the right so quickly as his dramatically radical actions. Firefly's executive orders on stem cell research, closing Gitmo and opening the borders all helped galvanize the Republicans. To say nothing of his smug arrogance, backed up by more of the same by the human hand puppets Reid and Pelosi. In just two months Firefly's inadvertant unifying of his political opposition, will be taught for decades in PoliSci classes as the prime example of what an incompetent, self-defeating politcal strategy looks like. Firefly has surpassed even Jimmy Carter for sheer arrogance and ineptitude.

In trying to act so quckly to get his agenda through before anyone noticed in a nation set up by it's founders to thwart such radicalism, in a culture that is independent and suspicious of increasing government intrusion, Firefly has ignited a nascent political revolt. And this revolt is only going to grow as the weeks and months pass by. The State Senate of New York has just switched to Republican control, and California has rejected new tax initiatives. These are the bluest of blue states. One cannot slough this off to any sort of red state hysteria. Firefly has brought the banking system under his control, and has done nothing to address its problems. He has also made GM and Chrysler wards of the state with himself as warden. Not a bright future for those companies, I'm afraid. And his next hoped for aquisition is the health care industry.

China now fears the debt we have accumulated, and is floating trial balloons to the effect that our borrowing days are numbered. Firefly can't print enough money to paper over that problem.

The war in Pakistan and the coming one in Israel with the Palestinians are beyond his control. Israel will not be bullied into suicide.

In the European Union the Left just got a big ass-kicking. Gordon Brown's socialist government in the UK will fall soon. Will Firefly's be far behind?

Read more!

DATELINE:PARIS

Welcome from Paris! I'm Jamesb and circumstance has led me to Europe...my school, the University of Texas El Paso teaches a Roman history class in Rome each summer so that seemed like a good enough excuse to take a Roman history class...been in Europe for the first time for just over two weeks now, I'm getting used to the Euro's refusing to serve soft drinks with ice, why I don't know...Rome was beautiful, a bit strange, but very nice. Traffic is down right funny to watch, bear in mind this Texan who has driven in New York City. The scooter jockeys are down right crazy; the late, great Evil Kenevil would be proud. In New York City six inches of room means "ya, go ahead, drive right in there you frigging jerk!", in Rome a millimeter (whatever that exactly is...) means that's enough room to GO FOR IT! Watching from the bus is downright entertaining, dodging flying scooters and micro cars at street level is downright scary. The Roman ruins are worth the look if your into that kind of stuff, and I am, but I'm really looking forward to visiting Omaha beach next week. It'll remind me how many young American gave their lives for the freedom of other countries, without hesitation and with honor and valor."We came as liberators not conquerors" as the Marine officer in the Military Channel promo so accurately says. Speaking of Rome traffic, Paris traffic is almost a wild. Apparently the entire system was designed by a guy named Clustier A. Fuque', but they do haul azz and do get around. There's more of a sense of urgency in France, Italians just don't seem to give a rats azz. Try to hurry an Italian and they just get slower, the French seem to "get it" and customer service isn't a suggestion it's actual concept, and I like that. Well, off to do the tourist thang...dodging African street vendors and other oddball shady characters...By the way, you'all remember the old Motely Crue song "Girls,Girls, Girls"? Vocalist Vince Neil reels off the names of a bunch of famous strip clubs including "...Crazy Horse, Paris France...forgot the names, remember romance..." well when in Paris do like the Crue would do, and it's right down the street...gonna be there tomorrow night...costing me an arm, a leg, and ...dammit, I don't care...it's goona be a blast! Talk to you soon...and as the King would say "Uh thank ya,thankya very much"...

Read more!